The RFAngle
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • ECONOMY
  • CULTURE
  • WORLD
PODCAST
SUPPORT US
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • ECONOMY
  • CULTURE
  • WORLD
No Result
View All Result
The RFAngle
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court rules against California’s in-home religious gatherings

Blair Nelson by Blair Nelson
April 10, 2021
in Politics
117 1
0
Home Politics

The Supreme Court ruled late on Friday in favor of removing restrictions on in-home religious gatherings, overturning a previous ruling by a lower court.

RELATEDARTICLES

Biden Surrenders Billions of Dollars in Weapons to the Taliban in Afghan Collapse

Chicago Police Officer Shot Dead During Traffic Stop

New York AG Finds Andrew Cuomo Sexually Assaulted Women, Biden Calls For His Resignation

The 5-4 ruling, dissented by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Stephen Breyer, follows other coronavirus restriction related cases heard by the Court.

The ruling states that before a government can limit religious gatherings, they must prove that they pose a greater risk than other non-religious activities, like going to the mall or eating at a restaurant.

“Otherwise, precautions that suffice for other activities suffice for religious exercise too,” said the majority opinion, also adding that California “treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise, permitting hair salons, retail stores, personal care services, movie theaters, private suites at sporting events and concerts and indoor dining at restaurants to bring together more than three households at a time.”

The ruling also added that the state cannot “assume the worst when people go to worship but assume the best when people go to work.”

“(California) has adopted a blanket restriction on at-home gatherings of all kinds, religious and secular alike,” said Kagan in the dissent of the ruling. “The law does not require that the State equally treat apples and watermelons.”

A federal judge had ruled against the plaintiffs, which was upheld by the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco.

">
ADVERTISEMENT

“The state reasonably concluded that when people gather in social settings, their interactions are likely to be longer than they would be in a commercial setting; that participants in a social gathering are more likely to be involved in prolonged conversations; that private houses are typically smaller and less ventilated than commercial establishments; and that social distancing and mask-wearing are less likely in private settings and enforcement is more difficult,” said the Ninth Circuit in their ruling.

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox, every month.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: californiacoronavirus restrictionsPandemicsupreme court
ShareTweetSend
">
ADVERTISEMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Taliban
World

Biden Surrenders Billions of Dollars in Weapons to the Taliban in Afghan Collapse

August 17, 2021
Chicago police gather outside the University of Chicago Medical Center
Crime

Chicago Police Officer Shot Dead During Traffic Stop

August 10, 2021
Cuomo
Politics

New York AG Finds Andrew Cuomo Sexually Assaulted Women, Biden Calls For His Resignation

August 3, 2021
AOC protest
Politics

Super-liberal Susan Sarandon Leads Protest Outside AOC’s NYC Office; Claims She’s Losing Faith in “the Squad”

August 3, 2021
Gun Owners
Second Amendment

Black Gun Owners Destroy ACLU’s Second Amendment Stance, “It Was About Checking Government, Not Anti-Blackness”

July 28, 2021
ACLU goes after the second amendment
Second Amendment

ACLU’s Dishonest Claim “Racism Is Foundational To The Second Amendment”

July 27, 2021

Discussion about this post

Official Poll

Should Dr. Fauci be fired?

Trending Stories

  • Donald Trump

    Trump Wins One of Two Wisconsin Supreme Court Decisions

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Former Capitol Police Chief Blows Hole in Dems Case Against Trump

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Oregon Considering Bill for Emergency Seizure of Private Property

    2 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Young female Trump supporter brutally beaten at DC Woman’s March

    136069 shares
    Share 139 Tweet 0
  • Oregon Considers Making COVID Restrictions PERMANENT

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
">
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Policy Information
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Our Team
  • Jobs
  • Contact Us

© 2020 The RFAngle - Turbocharged by AdRevv.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Culture
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Support

© 2020 The RFAngle - Turbocharged by AdRevv.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Policy.